Obama: “We Want Our Money Back!”

Like many of President Obama’s policies it seems the best this new “bank tax” can be characterized as is a good start. It’s certainly a shrewd political move, if nothing else.

The knee-jerk reaction from the The National Review was predictably shrill:

Seriously, what are they thinking about? Can’t the administration and Frank see that these types of measures will only hurt the recovery? The only effect of this tax will be to soak equity out these institutions limiting their ability to recover and issue loans. Plus haven’t most of these banks repaid the money they were forced to take from the government? With interest, no less.

And if Mister Frank really believes that chasing well-paid employees to go elsewhere is a winning strategy and won’t have any impact on the industry, then I suggest that next time he is sick he goes to a hospital where doctors are poorly paid and see how he feels about that.

This anti-capitalist and anti-wealth mentality is scary and very anti-American.

Yeah, my heart is just bleeding for those “poorly paid” bankers. And as “scary” and “anti-American” as Ms. de Rugy thinks the proposed tax is, she fails to note that it (or something like it) is actually required by law:

The EESA statute that created the TARP requires that by 2013 the President put forward a plan “that recoups from the financial industry an amount equal to the shortfall in order to ensure that the Troubled Asset Relief Program does not add to the deficit or national debt.”

I suppose it would have been too much trouble for anyone at The Corner to read the official government factsheet on the bank tax. Pesky facts… feh!

6 Comments

Filed under Economy, Obama Administration, Taxation

6 responses to “Obama: “We Want Our Money Back!”

  1. Ti-Guy

    They’re whining about recouping 110 billion dollars? That’s like 10 billion dollars in real, Canadian money, which is nothing.

    I don’t get it.

  2. Seems like a fairly modest amount. I don’t really see how anyone could oppose it — and if they do, it’s going to make them look fairly ridiculous. Maybe that’s the idea.

    Paging Michael Steele…

  3. Toe

    Obama had to do something for the ‘taxpayers’, because they want their vote back, watch the banks pass the tax onto the ‘taxpayers’.

  4. Ti-Guy

    Frankly, I don’t believe they’ve recouped 600 billion from TARP, nor do I believe 110 billion is all that’s left. Not in real money, in any case.

  5. Ti-Guy

    Sorry, not “from TARP” but what was alloted through TARP.

    Don’t want the Guzzler getting the red-arse over any miscommunication.

  6. Toe — If so, then it’s all the more reason to deal with smaller community banks (i.e., those with < $50 billion in assets).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s