Presumably she would be according to the standards of Blogging Tory “Conservative Queen” (not sure if that’s male or female) based on the above damning evidence. And just look at those devil eyes — proof doesn’t get any more conclusive than that!
h/t: Steve V at Far and Wide, Scott Tribe in the comments, and Cameron Campbell for the photo. Teamwork!
Filed under Idiot Bloggers, Kooks & Crackpots, Media Bias, Wingnuts
 | KEvron on Survey Says…? |
 | Rob H. on Survey Says…? |
| Rob H. on Survey Says…? |
 | trainman on A Red Tory Victory in Alb… |
 | aeneastheyounger on Rally for Zzzzzz… |
 | Sir Francis on Survey Says…? |
| Sir Francis on Rally for Zzzzzz… |
 | Parklife on Nerd Prom 2012 Speeches |
 | redtory on Survey Says…? |
| redtory on Rally for Zzzzzz… |
Pingback: » Paranoia and delusional = a scary combo. Scott’s DiaTribes: My personal opinions on social and political issues from a progressive standpoint.
Whatever Kady is, she obviously has a strong stomach.
Blogging Tories have standards?
I should have put it in quotes.
First time I’ve seen her without her shades.
She doesn’t wear them on TV.
Kady O’Malley has devil eyes, so hot…
(Or she can shoot laser beams out of her eyes which would be infinitely more cool in my books…)
Boy Toews sure has a glint in his eyes…..Mr. Morals likes young women apparently.
The Conserv. Queen blog on this is really quite creepy.
Definite “creep factor” there.
O’Malley got a nice dig in at the end of her live blogging at the committee hearing yesterday:
Remember that tie Dimitri had on at the cabinet technically-a-shuffle that I was — less than kind in describing? Compared to what Ryan Sparrow is wearing right now, it’s the most stylish, flattering tie that I’ve ever seen. I’d take a picture, but that would seem creepy, since he’s sitting over there all unaware.
Heh.
The Tory bloggers don’t think Kady is a good journalist – well she’s not – she’s fantastic, not just good and she does her homework, finds things out – all with a sense of humour.
No, she’s not good – she’s excellent and they don’t like it.
She’s irreverent and a little snarky and the Cons don’t like that. The Ha Ha is only funny if it involves pulling the rug out from Dion or attacking liberals, anything else is verbotten!
O’Malley by the way does take well-deserved shots at all parties and I certainly would hope she’d take the same kind of snide, sassy attitude towards a Liberal government. Personally, I quite like it when anyone in power, irrespective of their party, gets jabbed by the press.
O’Malley by the way does take well-deserved shots at all parties and I certainly would hope she’d take the same kind of snide, sassy attitude towards a Liberal government.
I imagine she would. She reminds me of Paul Wells that way; they report on politics for the benefit of us, their readers (who they assume are intelligent), not for the benefit of the politicians.
Most pundits act as if they’re doing God’s work by explaining/clarifying the mystifying garbage the politicians churn out…because the rest of us are just too stupid and addled to figure it out.
Whooee! That Kady’ll befriend anybody. She’s even one of JimBobby’s Facebook friends. We email back and forth every so often and Kady’s always prompt on the replies… like, within seconds.
I notice in the Queen’s comments, even Stephen Taylor says it’s a dumbass proposition. I love how all the poor persecuted Con’s are chimin’ in over there about what a great expose-eh them pitchers are. Not many sharp tacks in that box.
JB
That’s a good way of putting it.
I saw that comment by Taylor. I’m sure he doesn’t want his “Blogging Tories” to get branded as a bunch of creepy stalkers (in addition to being blithering idiots).
RT: That’s possible. But it’s also quite possible that Taylor is establishing plausible deniability here. This is creepy and a little weird, definitely black-oppo work, and you’d want to be sure that no “name-brand” BT is associated with it.
Besides, by having Taylor condemn it, it helps reduce the (quite valid) perception that the BTs are Harper’s minions, and that something like this would have been approved–or perhaps even ordered–by someone close to the party.
(And by creating “controversy”, you ensure that the charge remains newsworthy. Remember, people don’t remember context, they just remember claims. If everybody argues over validity of the charge that “Kady is a Liberal sympathizer”, what people will take away from it is the perception that Kady is a Liberal sympathizer. That’s what they want.)
That’s quite true. The fact the claim is baseless really doesn’t matter much.
“Kady is a Liberal sympathizer”
I agree with you. Kady O’Malley is indeed a Liberal sympathizer. It’s no secret.